Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pitchblend (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Pitchblend
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

2011 N/C, but absolutely no evidence they met N:MUSIC then, and definitely don't 12 years after they broke up. As raised in that AFD, a redirect to Pitchblende or deletion and move Pitchblende (disambiguation) to this title would make sense, but didn't feel it should be done unilaterally given that it also survived a speedy. Star  Mississippi  02:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, United Kingdom,  and England.  Star   Mississippi  02:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete and then Redirect to Pitchblende: I could not find the AllMusic review (which may have helped even prove the slimmest margin of notability), and search results elsewhere for coverage of either the band or their music turned up with nothing. I would personally delete it, as there is no need to maintain the page history, and then create a redirect. Why? I Ask (talk) 03:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Note that this band just barely survived a previous AfD with a "no consensus", and that was in 2011 when band notability rules were looser than they are now. Meanwhile, this article has something I don't think I've ever seen before: a link to AllMusic that is either dead or fake. There is no such album review at the AllMusic site now, and I cannot find the text that was supposedly quoted from reviewer Stewart Mason anywhere online. Otherwise, I was able to find two mentions at Drowned in Sound:, , but I don't think that adds up to the significant coverage that is necessary here. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 17:00, 8 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.