Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pittsburgh platter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   11:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Pittsburgh platter
Delete what appears to be a neologism. Mind matrix  20:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 21:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Ewww... Delete. Not that that's a criterion for deletion, but WP:NEO is, and I wish I would have known what this was before doing a search and finding out there was a website called www.turdwords.com... ewww... I was thinking it was some kind of local burger or something... Irongargoyle 22:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak, grossed out keep My google readings seem to indicate that this isn't WP:NFT, which these sort of neologisms often seem to be. I think it's on the level of Donkey Punch and Dirty Sanchez ie. mysoginistic and kind of juvenile, but nonetheless relevant to our (often mysoginistic and kind of juvenile) culture.  However, I won't kick a bit if the consensus is for delete.  Dina 22:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I definitely see your point, but Donkey Punch gets 200,000 hits, Dirty Sanchez gets over 1,500,000 and Pittsburgh platter gets barely over 1,000. It's never a good sign when your first google result is the urban dictionary. Irongargoyle 00:53, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have a high bar for fringe sexual slang terms.  Powers T 01:15, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per gargoyle. Wickethewok 14:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.