Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pitzer Run


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Merging may be further discussed on the article's talk page.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 01:05, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Pitzer Run

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Seems to lack enough notability to justify its own article. Wild Wolf (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 22:36, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep/merge This and other locations at the battle of Gettysburg are documented in numerous works such as Gettysburg: a battlefield guide. Whether they should be split into separate articles or be sections of a larger article is a matter of ordinary editing not deletion per our editing policy. Warden (talk) 11:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep/Merge Documentation is extensive for the geography of the Gettysburg battlefield, so this and other details of the battlefield should be kept. There are a great many articles on streams in Pennsylvania and other states already. One more is fine by me. --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge – into Gettysburg battlefield or similar.  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh &#91;chat] 23:16, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Read the article, and if references say it was an important location, then it is notable for a Wikipedia article. Nothing gained by destroying information like this.   D r e a m Focus  13:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge - its a stream only of note in regards to Gettysburg battlefield -   You  really  can  23:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Streams are generally considered notable, and this one has plenty of historical significance. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 02:26, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Geological features are notable for inclusion, especially with the addition of historical importance.Grillo7 (talk) 21:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.