Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piumi Hansamali (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:43, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Piumi Hansamali
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:BIO is not met here, notably WP:ANYBIO JusticeForce101 (talk) 13:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. JusticeForce101 (talk) 13:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. –  The Grid  ( talk )  15:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. –  The Grid  ( talk )  15:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:32, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. Was this article ever deleted after the previous AfD closed as "delete" on January 22, 2020? User:Gihan Jayaweera seems to have simply removed the AfD banner the day of a year after the AfD closure. Did the deletion ever occur? Pilaz (talk) 16:34, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. It was deleted and then gently came to main space again. --JusticeForce101 (talk) 10:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * You need to click on "logs" above to get more of the story. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Check here who re-created and accepted to mainspace. It is not me. So, when some admins accept them after many reviews, some amateur editors again nominate them to delete. What is the point on that? Clearly, you all can see that, this editor is keep insulting my work by citing many lies. He has some anger with me. I don't know why. But this is unacceptable.  Gihan Jayaweera   TALK  13:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. Thanks everyone for your comments, I should have checked the logs. Pilaz (talk) 14:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.