Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piwik PRO Analytics Suite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Piwik PRO Analytics Suite

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I appreciate the paid disclosure from the creator of this article, but I don't see this meeting NCORP and it should have gone through AfC. Similar appears to be have been deleted at Articles for deletion/Piwik PRO, Articles for deletion/Piwik PRO (2nd nomination). Disregarding that, none of the sources are sufficient to pass NCORP, many are press releases or primary sources related to the company. There's a bunch of statistic sites (e.g. ), which in counts as trivial coverage under "inclusion in collections that have indiscriminate inclusion criteria". Other trivial coverage under ncorp includes raising capital. Many supposed third-party sources are written or possibly written by the company and thus primary ( is written by their PR manager, is written by a "guest writer", and covers a merger which is also trivial coverage). BEFORE search only turns up more of the same. Pahunkat (talk) 10:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Pahunkat (talk) 10:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Internet, Software,  and Poland.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per my previous assessment of this aricle before my BLAR, I substantially agree with the assessment of potential sources. All I have to add is that I reiterate my recomendation to the article creator that any such future edits go through the appropriate processes (Articles for creation, Edit requests). The community's patience is not infinite, and while I do not pretend to be a barometer in this specific regard, moving through the proper channels may reduce the pace at which such patience wears. Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Sources fail WP:ORGCRIT, and BEFORE search turns up nothing else. Should this discussion result in deletion, I recommend WP:SALTing "Piwik Pro" and permutations of it given persistent efforts to reject community consensus and evade appropriate channels like AfC for paid edits. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.