Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixadex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Pixadex

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I can't find any significant coverage in WP:SECONDARY sources for this software. The only review I found is on a personal website. Pcap ping  11:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  12:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

i see no reason for deletion. the information is accurate, concise and supported by external links. the information is important for historical purposes. it will become more important over time as websites change and companies go out of business. finding information on older software can be very difficult --Ed andrews (talk) 15:41, 24 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:57, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: The main thing that I found was software updates, but that isn't significant coverage. Joe Chill (talk) 17:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.