Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PixelPoint


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

PixelPoint

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is blatant advertising; it is an orphan page for a non-notable company with all "references" coming from the company website. A clear case of self-promotion. See similar: Volante Systems, PCS Revenue Control Systems. Timneu22 (talk) 23:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete spam RadioFan (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. The company doesn't even exist any more, having been absorbed or merged with another non-notable company in 2005. Even that merger didn't make the news, which shows how non-notable both companies are. --MelanieN (talk) 04:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Chuckle. Timneu22 (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I was going to say merge, but the parent company doesn't even have an article, so there's no where to merge to.  PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 17:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - but only  if it  is rapidly  expaned with more detail  about  how it  is employed in  its user environment, more about the technology  involved, and something about  similar products. I've had a quick go  at  improving  it: there are thousands of applications out there for niche market  solutions and while most  of them  do  not  get  rave reviews in  the print  media, some of them  do  quite well. Pixel Point  may  be one of these. Its article in Wikipedia might  be advertising, and there might  be COI, but  I'm  assuming  it  was created in good faith, and that  it  can take its place alongside dozens of similar Wikipedia software articles. --Kudpung (talk) 02:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.