Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixel overdrive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Pixel overdrive

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The concept "pixel overdrive" appears to be idiosyncratic, from the title of a patent. There are no independent sources about it apparently, and so it's not notable. If any sources are found, the concept can be mentioned in the LCD article as the merge proposal suggests, but at this time it's not even worth mentioning, it seems. Dicklyon (talk) 16:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTE's basic criteria. No coverage from reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. ThePointblank (talk) 05:33, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - there's no coverage about this beyond filing of patent documents. -- Whpq (talk) 17:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.