Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pizza Ranch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP Toddst1 (talk) 16:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Pizza Ranch

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NN company. No substantial coverage other than "politician stopped by" or "Another Pizza Ranch Employee Has Hepatitis A" - Fails WP:Corp Toddst1 (talk) 22:48, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I would imagine a company of this size probably has some marginal notability. I did find this which looks like a decent source. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - A 140-outlet full service casual restaurant chain is more or less guaranteed to be notable. It's the 282nd largest restaurant chain in the US as of 2006.  Surely there's room in Wikipedia for 400 food service chain articles.  If you look at the google news hits, plenty of sources, the better side of 1,000 of them.  A number are RS and give substantial coverage. Wikidemo (talk) 00:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep given number of outlets. -- JulesN   Talk  01:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, hundreds of Google Archive results available for immediate sourcing, no number required. Search on one cofounder, but I don't recommend searching on the other unless you have a strong stomach. --Dhartung | Talk 04:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, otherwise we'd have herds of pizza stampeding everywhere. Clarityfiend (talk) 16:11, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.