Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Places in The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete; however, if anyone wants to transwiki this, let me know and appropriate measures will be taken. &mdash; Deckiller 14:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Places in The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Large page filled with mostly non-notable locations from a single game with very little if any sourcing. DurinsBane87 15:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * weak delete - while I can agree with the rationale, we need to make absolutely sure that we transwiki this - a lot of work has been done on this, and it's definitely Zelda wikia appropriate.KrytenKoro 15:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete this completely unencycolpedic crap with extreme prejudice. Piperdown 16:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete based on WP:FICT. WP:FICT gives notability to major characters, but not to every place on the map in a video game.   I think this is almost to a game guide level, which violates WP:NOT Corpx 17:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep; OoT is a very influential game, so I think this article is appropriate; however, it is too guide-ish at the moment, some things need revising and cutting down. I may start working on this, if I get round to it. Haipa Doragon 11:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 13:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The necessary cleanup would make this far too short, because most of this is unsourceable and not that encyclopedic. But definitely make sure to transwiki, if there isn't something like this over on Wikia. -Amarkov moo! 20:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't care about whether this is deleted, but please redirect this (and all redirects) to The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time if the consensus is to delete or merge. I'd rather we not lose all these redirects. --- RockMFR 22:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * redirect? Do you expect someone to actually type in "Places in the Legend of..." into wikipedia? Piperdown 23:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * ...yeah? Since people visited this page beforehand?KrytenKoro 23:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Not sure what you're trying to say, but I'd expect that this page was found if at all by readers clicking on a link to it (assuming that link exists there) on the main page concerning this video game. So...are you yet another wikipedian who thinks there's nothing wrong with people creating articles that are 100% original research, its contents in no way verified with reliable sources as wikipedia defines them? Piperdown 23:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, what he was saying that since people already knew it existed, if they wanted to go there, they would just type it into the search. Secondly, he already voted weak delete, so keep your accusatory personal attacks to yourself. DurinsBane87 23:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * What "accusatory personal attacks" would that be? I've done no such thing so stop the false accusations of me personally attacking anyone. How do you feel about WP:OR? I'm asking. It wasn't a snide question. It's a real one. I'm shocked at how many people commenting on AFD's have no idea that Original Research is not allowed on wikipedia, and most of these articles would have no content without OR. Piperdown 23:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * "So...are you yet another wikipedian who thinks there's nothing wrong with people creating articles that are 100% original research, its contents in no way verified with reliable sources as wikipedia defines them?" is accusatory, and as for my stance, I was the person who nominated this for AfD, along with the "places in..Twilight princess." DurinsBane87 00:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Vouching for myself, most of my edits are aimed at trying to remove OR, speculation, and that whole deal. I in fact did a lot of work on this page trying to remove all the nonsense that had been built into it.KrytenKoro 00:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * How about we do the logical thing? Delete the article if consensus is to delete, and if someone wants to create a redirect, we can discuss if that should be deleted later. -Amarkov moo! 01:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.