Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Places of Worship in Banbury


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  17:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Places of Worship in Banbury

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unfortunately we do not have a speedy category for this. But it is a straightforward violation of Wikipedia is not a directory. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 03:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I should note though, looking at the length of the article, it might be a good idea to create Religion in Banbury. Ottre 04:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I suggest doing it the Wikipedia way, and expanding Banbury until such a point as a breakout sub-article is actually required. Uncle G (talk) 14:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: very Unencyclopedic, fails notability. Waterjuice (talk) 04:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, nominator has identified this clearly. Just one note on the Religion in Banbury: are there reliable sources?  Nyttend (talk) 15:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I just sent off a couple of emails to that effect. Ottre 04:14, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Update: no responses, so I guess not. Ottre 01:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, clearly. ukexpat (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete In regard to WP:NOTDIR standards. Pastor Theo (talk) 23:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It's an alphabetical list of names, addresses, telephone numbers, and web sites. Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages, and that is exactly what this is.  Please contribute this sort of thing to Yellowikis.  Delete. Uncle G (talk) 14:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.