Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plamf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Plamf

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This dubious neoglism is allready on Wiktionary. There is no reason for it to be here, per WP:NAD DFS454 (talk) 12:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Made up word. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, especially not for one where the first hit of the word is Urban Dictionary. - Mgm|(talk) 13:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - preferably speedy as hoax/vandalism. AlexTiefling (talk) 14:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or link to Wiktionary -- this article's up for deletion on Wiktionary too, so the outcome of this debate should hinge on the outcome on Wiktionary.
 * If deleted on Wiktionary -> Delete
 * If kept on Wiktionary -> Replace content with link to wiktionary definition.
 * -- S Marshall  Talk / Cont  14:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * NOTE It has now been deleted from Wiktionary --DFS454 (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Neologisms must go. §FreeRangeFrog 18:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, as part of the same pattern of vandalism as Maksist, and Bloof, both of which were posted by users now blocked for vandalism ,and sockpuppetry. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.