Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plan It X Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Jaranda wat's sup 01:09, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Plan It X Records
Spam, minor local record label Reid A. 00:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Article survived VfD once already (in 2004, see Talk:Plan It X Records), and I was convinced enough from comments on Articles for deletion/Ghost Mice that the label, although not meeting the normal guidelines we might use, is notable enough to keep. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 01:10, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, clearly verifiable. In my opinion, Wikipedia doesn't need notability requirements, and on this issue my opinion is not contrary to policy. &mdash;Simetrical (talk) 04:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep.Per Howcheng. It has sufficient notability to keep-- Dak ota     t     e   04:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 13:32, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.