Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Namek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Dragon Ball. PhilKnight (talk) 14:38, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Planet Namek

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article asserts zero notability through reliable sources. It deserves a two-three sentence mention in the main series article, but not a whole article that is simply plot repetition culled from other Dragon Ball articles plot sections. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's not that important, the article is barely worked on and it's almost irrelevent anyway because there are only two DB-related articles that actually link there. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 00:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge' per nominator's suggestion to point to a "two-three sentence mention in the main series article".--Troikoalogo (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Roast it and serve it up with Saiyan sauce, er, I mean delete. Actually reluctantly. But this is merely in-universe info. There is no real world significance. The place for this would be a DZ webpage or Wiki. 70.126.47.211 (talk) 03:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Dlohcierekim&#39;s sock (talk) 03:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per Troikoalogo. It would seem that a list article would be more appropriate, but I seem to recall that getting deleted recently, too. JuJube (talk) 03:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as not having a chance to be ever more than a plot summary, or merge and/or redirect to Namekian until that article can be cleaned up as well (cutting back slowly). – sgeureka t•c 05:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep in some capacity as it does get at least some Google books hits, which means the information can be verified in multiple primary and secondary sources. -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 08:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Uh, most of the books are dragon ball z magazines, which is a primary source. The other ones are irrelevant. Pie is good   (Apple is the best)  20:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Magazines are reliable secondary sources. -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 20:45, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No real world significance. Merge would also be acceptable. Doceirias (talk) 20:12, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.