Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planetouched (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 14:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Planetouched
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This fails to establish notability. The previous AfD seems to have been an "it's important" argument rather than anything to do with passing WP:N. TTN (talk) 12:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep It's obviously not an article of interest to everybody (including me), but it's well sourced, and it's expanded significantly since the last time somebody wanted to delete it. XeroxKleenex (talk) 14:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per XeroxKleenex, or merge to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters per WP:PRESERVE and WP:ATD. BOZ (talk) 15:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - It is not well sourced, as every source being used are primary sources and/or game books, neither of which do anything to indicate notability. That appears to be the only sources available for this non-notable fictional topic, so it fails the WP:GNG.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The article cites only primary sources. It would need non-primary sources to pass WP:GNG. Not a very active user (talk) 15:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete insufficient RS to establish how it passes the GNG Chetsford (talk) 21:00, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete article fails GNG, contains not a single source that contributes towards it. Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails NFICTION. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.