Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planetrise Cultural and Environmental Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:44, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Planetrise Cultural and Environmental Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A rather promotional article with no independent sources at all, and no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The article was previously deleted by DGG under speedy deletion criterion A7 (no credible indication of importance). It was then re-created by the same person as before (a single-purpose account), with virtually no changes. In my opinion it still qualifies for speedy deletion criterion A7, but since its author has re-created it, I decided to start a discussion, to settle once and for all whether it is considered suitable, rather than risk starting a create/delete war.

As I said above, the article cites no independent sources at all. I searched for information, under both the English name and the Hungarian name (Földkelte Kulturális és Környezetvédelmi Egyesület) and found Wikipedia (both English and Hungarian), other wikis, FaceBook, sites which merely list basic information about businesses and other organisations, and other pages barely mentioning the organisation, but nothing that could possibly be regarded as substantial coverage in an independent source. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:41, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:00, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:00, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:00, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:29, 20 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Last relist Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:54, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:54, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; the article is strictly advertorial and I'm sure this content can be found on the org's web site. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:03, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Forget notability, there is absolutely no claim of significance and it is speedy eligible. There is literally no independent sources about the organisation. The purpose of the article seems to be to promote a non-notable organisation. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.