Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planned Parenthood of Illinois


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 05:28, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Planned Parenthood of Illinois

 * – ( View AfD View log )

While Planned Parenthood is no doubt notable and important, I'm not sure every state chapter is notable enough for a separate article. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  05:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 08:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 08:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 08:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Planned Parenthood: I brought this up as WP:CSD (organization not asserting notability). No reason to believe that this chapter does anything that stands out from its parent organization or otherwise meets Notability (organizations and companies).  (Same user created Planned Parenthood Illinois Action, up for deletion as Articles for deletion/Planned Parenthood Illinois Action, for what it's worth.) --Closeapple (talk) 08:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:CLUB. Redirect would also be OK but seems unnecessary. --MelanieN (talk) 15:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, this state chapter is not independently notable. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 21:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:37, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete according to our established practice for stater branches of societies without major individual separate notability . I see no reason to redirect: essentially ever major organization in the US has the expected 50 branches. People will know to look for the name of the main  organization, and the only purpose of the redirects would be promotional.  DGG ( talk ) 05:35, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per DGG's reasoning. Don&#39;t call me shorely (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.