Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planned towers2

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete all pages. - Mailer Diablo 02:58, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Planned Towers

 * Pegasus Broadcasting Tower
 * CBC Real Estate Tower Auburn
 * Cumulus Tower Stowell
 * Beasley Tower
 * SpectraSite Tower Raymond
 * William M Smith Tower
 * New Wavo Tower
 * Pappas Telecasting Tower Superior
 * Central Missouri State University Tower Syracuse
 * Pappas Telecasting Tower Ravenna
 * Mann Media Tower Randallmann
 * KTBS Tower Shreveport
 * South Texas Broadcasting Tower Bold Springs
 * Young Broadcasting Tower Branch
 * Richland Towers Cusseta
 * Centex Television Tower Moody
 * Communication Site Managment Tower Farmington
 * Pappas Telecasting Tower Astico
 * Cumulus Broadcasting Tower Haynesville

All of these are planned towers listed at List of masts. Delete because Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. If any of these towers have been built already despite being listed here as planned, then we should keep, or maybe redirect them. Dave the Red (talk) 06:01, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. The only information on these pages comes directly from wireless2.fcc.gov, and if we add this link to external links on List of masts, there is no need for these articles, which should not be here according to the crystal ball policy. --Halidecyphon 07:40, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Concur, delete. Radiant_* 10:16, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all. I'm not even sure that they should get articles when they're built.  Not too much different than articles about, say, individual telephone poles, or satellite dishes.  I guess they have their hobbyists/fans (hence the articles) but this being a general-interest encyclopedia rather than a communication structure guide, an annotated list should be enough. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  16:16, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with above.  Repeat information and not useful or encyclopedic.  --Randy 21:27, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all of them. Except under the most unusual circumstances, radio masts just don't need their own articles. A table or annotated list in one article should suffice&mdash;after these masts have been constructed. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 01:18, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete even if the things get built. Most radio towers are not notable. Could perhaps be a list in unified article. Dsmdgold 02:14, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment There are a whole slew of stubby articles on non-notable towers at List of masts. Someone with more time than I have should merge those articles into one article. Dave the Red (talk) 03:13, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Perhaps a redirect if and when built, but not really necessary. Usually, broadcasting towers are of little interest. Sjakkalle 06:36, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.