Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plantagon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 02:20, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Plantagon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Re-creation of a previously deleted article. Plantagon is a small Swedish company with only a handful of employees that tries to exploit the long existing ideas of Vertical farming. Most sources in the article are selfpublished, either directly (the company website) or indirectly (mynewsdesk.com etc). The company spends a lot of energy marketing themselves and their CEO (Hans Hassle, an article that is almost exclusively edited by Hassle himself and Plantagon) but have very little success to show in their actual field of business. If the article had mainly showed existing installations, and proof of them being an established company in their field, I wouldn't oppose having the article, but since it's almost exclusively about what the company plans to do, and talk about vertical farming in general, I don't feel it belongs here. Because Wikipedia is not a place for marketing products or ideas. Thomas.W  talk to me  16:00, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:57, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Keep for now - and I will take a closer look at the article.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:29, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.