Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planted motif search


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. (non-admin closure)  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:45, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Planted motif search

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article appears to be a How To, or original Research, perhaps a treatise for a dissertation. What it is not, certainly as it stands, is an article for Wikipedia. The topic area itself may be notable, though the article does not assert this in a meaningful way. WP:TNT feels appropriate. At the very least it requires discussion. Fiddle  Faddle  20:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Withdraw on the basis of the work done in the article to render the lead and other parts to a state where notability is asserted. Fiddle   Faddle  21:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep – this article is clearly notable as there are a fair number of papers that have been published on the subject. I agree with the nom that this article needs extensive editing to focus less on "How To" and more on "Why".  I have edited the lead so that the importance of this subject is hopefully now clearer.  Boghog (talk) 05:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.