Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plash (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The soft redirect to Wiktionary proposal has not received support thus not going for that here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Plash
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, as per several source searches. North America1000 10:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * This really must go as there's no good reason at all for its continued inclusion. HOWEVER rather than delete revert to situation as ay April 4, 2011 - soft redirect to wiktionary. S a g a C i t y (talk) 15:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 16:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This is not my field, but I cannot find anything that constitutes substantive coverage. Vanamonde (talk) 18:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage, and previous afd had no keep votes or additional sources provided. Dialectric (talk) 15:27, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Software does not have enough coverage to warrant an article. -- Dane 2007  talk 19:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.