Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plasmanium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Plasmanium

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Borderline WP:A11, appears to be a non-notable in-game faction. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  00:17, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  00:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - no references, let alone any reliable sources.--Rpclod (talk) 01:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above - no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of notability, especially in a real-world context. BenLinus  1214 talk 02:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to be made up, no evidence whatsoever on this being a real thing. WHOISFANDOMtalk 01:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Possible hoax, if not then it fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 7 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had zero hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please ping me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. czar ⨹   02:19, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.