Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plato's four cardinal virtues


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Cardinal virtues. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:45, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Plato's four cardinal virtues
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contest prod. This article is a WP:COATRACK to push a particular WP:POV of material covered in The Republic (Plato). The editor who contested the prod last October has removed their objection, but an admin said that this was insufficient to renew the prod process and would have to go through an AfD.  RJC  TalkContribs 22:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:12, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  --  RJC  TalkContribs 22:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This article appears to cover the same ground as the Cardinal virtues article. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge into Cardinal virtues per the virtues of prudence and temperance. See The four cardinal virtues for an example of a recent source. Colonel Warden (talk) 07:15, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge per Colonel Warden. The article cardinal virtues refers to Plato as being the originator, but no redirect that mentions Plato.  A lot of the redirects to the article can and should be deleted, since they're just variations on capitalization-- "Cardinal Virtues", "Cardinal virtue", "Cardinal Virtue", etc.  Mandsford (talk) 13:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge into Cardinal virtues and delete article. No direct reference to Plato is correct unless it is limited to the relevant Republic section. Currently article fails to meet Wikipedia quality standards.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.146.197.78 (talk) 05:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.