Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Platonic epistemology


 * Delete. Delete fast.  Delete ruthlessly.  (this has nothing to do with the bible-babble, but I can't stand it when people use "principal" when they mean "principle") Dukeofomnium 13:03, 28 May 2004 (UTC) As rewritten, keep Dukeofomnium 16:32, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)


 * Content appears to be about why Christianity is better than Plato. May be a class assignment. At a minimum, needs a change of title and lots of wikification. m.e. 13:04, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. No amount of wikification can save this.--Bwmodular 14:58, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Possible copyvio --- see sig at end.  Platonic epistemology deserves an article, but I can't see anything here helpful to someone who wishes to write a real one.  Smerdis of Tlön 15:11, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Abigail 15:44, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Cleanse it with fire. Wile E. Heresiarch 16:53, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Possible copyvio, definite bible-babble and hopelessly POV. Reads like a Jack Chick comic gone bonkers.  Delete. - Lucky 6.9 17:44, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Thue 18:34, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Really looks more like a class assignment. Completely unreadable but no reason to bother wikifying it. POV. I would rather say the sig belongs to someone who wants to spread his propaganda. Lev 19:03, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * I give it an F. Oops, I mean, delete. -- Matty j 23:00, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Should have been speedy deleted.  RickK 19:31, 29 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. This ranks among the most idiosyncratic and tangled pieces of writing I have ever seen here. Denni 21:44, 29 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like copyright vio and wouldn't be encyclopoedic even if it weren't. The subject does deserve an article, but you can't get there from here. --Christofurio 01:22, May 31, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Masi27185 11:16, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
 * I've nuked it and replaced it with a stub that I think is broadly accurate... The Land 20:37, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
 * New version looks fine. Keep.