Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PlayMillion.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

PlayMillion.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Online gambling site that does not meet WP:GNG. Plenty of references, but nothing in-depth from WP:RS. Claim is that it is ranked as one of the top 100 worldwide gaming sites. Claim is dubious and not supported by reliable source. CNMall41 (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - this company is listed as in the Top 100 Casino sites in the world. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   21:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That is a dubious honor, but where are the reliable sources that discuss this? I see the sources, but I do not see any reliable source that would meet WP:RS. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * For example, the Canadian Gambling Insider article links out to PlayMillion.com. However, if you look close, it is an affiliate link to the site. A publication that is unbiased and has editorial oversight is not likely to include an affiliate links like that within an article. The only reason to do so is to make money which shows that the article is likely written to drive traffic to PlayMillion.com - and referral revenue for CGI. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * According to me, meets of WP:RS. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   22:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, sst ✈(conjugate) 00:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am not convinced there are independent reliable sources, and the article is basically an advertisement to the extent I would consider G11 speedy: "The company actively promotes responsible gaming in a safe environment and protects vulnerable persons from any possibility of abuse or danger. "  DGG ( talk ) 01:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not yet better convincing for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  02:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.