Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PlayVix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 20:59, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

PlayVix

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Magnet for original research. I couldn't find any reliable sources about it. HamburgerRadio (talk) 07:25, 22 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Unambiguous attack page Speedy Delete per speedy criterion G-10. Simonm223 (talk) 15:40, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Declined G10. If it's a hoax, it's G3.  G10 is not for attacks on things that don't actually exist. G10 is a nuclear option, and I just don't see a need for it in this case. No opinion on AfD outcome. Jclemens (talk) 17:04, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This appears to be G3, or if anything, its more patent nonsense to be honest. --Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! (talk) 19:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear. I'm not saying this software doesn't exist. I did some digging at Talk:PlayVix --HamburgerRadio (talk) 01:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

I think that this should be deleted. After doing some research on the subject, I can't see any legitimate sources that describe what PlayVix is or what it does. At the very least, it meets the notability criteria for deletion.
 * Quanticle (talk) 01:07, 29 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.