Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playbak Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Playbak Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I would quite honestly suggest we have an unspecified paid advertisement here because the author has avidly removed any attempts of changes, including the last attempt of 2 for dele, I still confirm my PROD as it in fact also suggested advertising motivations. WP:NOT explicitly allows removal of such blatancy and there's no questions about it. SwisterTwister  talk  22:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. A previous version with a different title (Playbak) was deleted as spam (G11). The current version does not qualify under G11, though. However, looking at the sources we have ref. 1 which looks like it's a press release, ref. 2 which is about the magazine's founder and only mentions it in-passing, and ref 3. which is just a newsfeed. The external links are inappropriate links to the magazine's Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram accounts, a link to a YouTube video (not a reliable source), a photo of unclear relevance where Playbak is mentioned, a link to someone's personal website where the magazine is mentioned in-passing, and a link to a site offering the magazine for sale. In short, not a single one of these references provides the in-depth coverage in reliable sources that is needed to establish notability. --Randykitty (talk) 09:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:09, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per G5, see Sockpuppet investigations/Daniel Kobe Ricks Jr. GABgab 15:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.