Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playcrafter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 22:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Playcrafter

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Very big ripoff clone of the article Roblox. Jeremjay 24  ''' 01:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Jeremjay  24  ''' 01:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Two things here -- one, you did not give any real rationale per Deletion policy, and second, if you nominate you don't 'vote' too. --Teancum (talk) 14:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  MrKIA11 (talk) 13:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - But on the basis that no reliable sources were found. Incidentally, the article this supposedly copied, Roblox turned up no reliable sources either and might be considered for deletion as well as I couldn't find any significant coverage for it either - all the sources on that page but a few are primary sources, the rest are press releases or passing mentions. --Teancum (talk) 14:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - I rewrote the whole article, and i am very sorry that a member of playcrafter thought it would be a good idea to rip off the roblox article, some of the things in the article didn't even add up! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Infinitydelta (talk • contribs) 09:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of independent coverage, ergo no evidence of notability. Nuttah (talk) 17:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.