Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Player (game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gameplay. ✗ plicit  12:23, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Player (game)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I stumbled upon this after from ongoing Articles for deletion/Contestant. At first, I thought about proposing a merger to much better Gamer, but the sourced content is just a common-sense definition for the sentence that "most games require players" (really? and most? Well, I guess there are zero player games but sigh). There is also player (sport) that I redirected to Athlete. In summary, this article seems like a poor quality, essentially unreferenced stub fork of gamer and should redirect there. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gameplay as a WP:ATD. It basically means the same thing, "the specific way in which players interact with a game". Although the article is also in a really poor state, it has more potential for improvement. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gamer per nom. The article is an unnecessary content fork that fails WP:NOTDICT. Gamer would be the more applicable article for people searching for Player (game) since it refers to the person playing rather than the gameplay itself. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gameplay. The concept of a participant to a game is don't mandate a long explanation and a full article. I am not sure about the connection with Gamer, as Gamer describes more of an enthusiast of games than a participant. NasssaNser (talk/edits) 15:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect per norm. --Vaco98 (talk) 17:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gameplay, which I think is a more appropriate target than "Gamer". NOTDICDEF per above. Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Gameplay; seems to be more directly related than "Gamer". &horbar;Jochem van Hees (talk) 00:48, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to gameplay, if it is kept at all (I would not be opposed to deletion).--AlexandraIDV 08:34, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.