Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Players


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Yuser31415 20:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Players

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Gibberish, NPOV, whatever else you can think of. dsm iv tr 03:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please check for vandalism before AfD'ing. Before this IP edit, the article was about a TV show and was not gibberish. I have reverted to the non-vandalised version and re-added the AfD notice; I'd call for a speedy close now except that I'm not sure whether this TV show meets WP:N. cab 04:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Nominated in error as stated by cab. Series is notable judging by the impressive cast/guest stars. Players should link directly to Players (disambiguation) as there's no clear primary use of the word, but that's another discussion. Saikokira 05:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. As noted it's a valid article that just happened to be vandalised when the OP noticed it. Ben W Bell   talk  08:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to Players (1997 TV series) and move Players (disambiguation) to Players. This TV show doesn't seem to be any more notable than the other articles with the name. Otherwise, keep.--SeizureDog 10:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to Players (1997 TV series) per SeizureDog cab 23:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and move per Seizuredog. This should not be squatting on such a common term. -- Dhartung | Talk 10:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.