Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Players of 3D Space Cadet Pinball Who Can't Get It Up To Satisfy Their Wives


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was snowy delete (and BJAODN).  Sango  123   00:06, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Players of 3D Space Cadet Pinball Who Can't Get It Up To Satisfy Their Wives
nn reference to only part of a blog on Angelfire about stupid erectile dysfunctionality conspiracy theory - come on SM247 03:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Yanksox 03:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom and per the article, which admits that the subject blog is "obscure." 03:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC) (comment by Cfred)
 * Delete, nn. --Ter e nce Ong 03:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. 23skidoo 03:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete the title's enough. CP/M 04:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Relevant to pop culture. Similar to Chuck Norris Facts, another nonsensical website that enjoys Wikipedia status. Seanlynch44 05:46, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This is not similar to Chuck Norris' array of facts, a well known and notable phenomenon. This is obscure and not notable. That is why the former 'enjoys Wikipedia status' and the latter should not. SM247 05:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Agree with SM247. The "Chuck Norris facts" turn up all over the place. This one doesn't, and WP isn't the place to help it along. Paddles TC 07:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment These are very valid points. Very funny though... BJAODN Seanlynch44 23:46, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. -- Kjkolb 07:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable blog. If a one-line comment about the impotence theory appeared in the hypothetical Space Cadet (pinball) article, I expect it would get deleted as hoax/vandalism. Paddles TC 07:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Trash, not notable/spam.-- A n d e h 10:07, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Molerat 10:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * What the ... Delete for the love of all things good and holy BigDT 12:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hysterically funny...BJADON (That's the wrong spelling, isn't it?). And Delete'. Vizjim 15:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, non-funny. - CNichols 16:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Absurd. Xyra  e  l  T 16:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per everything above Trebor 17:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Copy to BJAODN then Delete. Not encylopedia-worthy, but definitely funny enough to be kept. ^ demon  [yell at me][ubx_war_sux] /18:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Borderline libel if intended seriously, lame joke if not. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. 8 comments on the entire blog. Even I have more than that... BrokenBeta  &#x5B;talk · contribs&#x5D; 20:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete All I have to say is, "Wow..." --Dakart 01:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Supremely lame and non-notable. Grand  master  ka  01:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. All you nerds are just afraid you won't be able to get it up anymore since you've most likely played 3DSCP. User:Pinballer4life 01:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment NPA, thanks. But, in my defense and all, I have no issues in that arena, and I *have* played the game. ^ demon  [yell at me][ubx_war_sux] /09:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect to Viagra (jk). &mdash; RJH (talk) 20:26, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Hilarious, but not true (obviously). This should be put into BJAODN. --FlyingPenguins 20:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Copy to BJAODN then Delete. People are saying it's funny. --mboverload @  03:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN (noting that it was created by User:Seanlynch44, for GFDL purposes). —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 03:33, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.