Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playrix Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Playrix Entertainment

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I nominated this for deletion because the subject does not meet notability criteria. There's no reliable mainstream source that confirms the importance of this company. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for people to peddle their products. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Picardinthesink (talk • contribs) 2009/06/20 16:42:11
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Conditional Keep I'm having problems with the Russian sources (my Russian is really bad), but it looks like there is one really good English source: . If all the other Russian sources are bogus then I'd probably move to weak delete.  But I'm assuming one or two of them will help with WP:N and thus we have enough. Hobit (talk) 14:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Insufficient evidence of notability.Dino Velvet 8MM (talk) 02:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Google News results provide sufficient coverage to establish notability ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep without prejudice against another discussion further down the line. Interviews alone aren't brilliant for establishing notability (they just consist of the subject talking about themselves), but Gamezebo is a great source for the casual sector. The company's games are reviewed on quality sites like Gamezebo, GameZone and IGN, according to a press release from this month they're moving onto the Wii and DS. There's a reasonable argument for keeping it without further sources, but if they do release software on the Ninty consoles then there's going to be a lot more sources and some individually notable games possibly needing articles as well. Someoneanother 18:22, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.