Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Please Like Me, Schoolmate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 00:07, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Please Like Me, Schoolmate

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a hoax or a vanity page. Found no sourcing in English that was not a mirror of the WP article, and no sources in Japanese at all. Dekkappai (talk) 21:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I have found no evidence that the show is real, hence atm I believe the article should be deleted per WP:HOAX, as suggested by the nominator. Allventon (talk) 21:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - all the other contributions of appear to be hoax or fantasy, and with no sources it seems this is, too. JohnCD (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Note: I don't think this is "blatant and obvious misinformation". It could possibly be a real subject. And, as I am not an expert in manga/anime, I hope to have input from those who are. The article has been here since May 2008. Another five days to research before deleting it would not damage WP. Dekkappai (talk) 22:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Probably delete - could be a hoax, could be a forthcoming work, but there are no sources available to check. pablo hablo. 23:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Future work or not, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Alpha 4615 (talk) 23:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - No verifiable sources, per above, per nom. Alpha 4615 (talk) 23:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not appear to actually exist. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 14:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clearly a hoax. -- Goodraise (talk) 14:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete it now Cheap & gross hoax. No ANN for both the title and the author. No scanlation and Not referenced among scanlation related websites again for both the title and author. Researchs with Japanese title return craps. Dates are fake as Lala release the 24th of each month that was the case of for April 2008 and i can prove it. It spread to Fr wikipedia modification dating from 31 July 2008. Even if the date give him/her the benefit of doubt, should i inquire how this editor ended adding that stuff ? KrebMarkt 15:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. By the way, the manga is listed on List of manga licensed in English and is said to be licensed by Viz. I'll remove the statement as there's no sources to indicate that. ~ Itzjustdrama C  ? 21:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per all comments above. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems the OC has a history of vandalism via hoaxes. --Farix (Talk) 23:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, complete hoax. I have every issue of Shojo Beat in existance and no such manga ever appeared in it. Google searches turn up nothing but copies of its Wiki pages. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 23:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, I found this in a google search. Its not in English or Japanese. http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/9852998 -- Metalb (talk) 16:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment that's probably a mirror or a copy of the Wikipedia article pablo hablo. 16:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.