Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pleased to Meet You (Wolfmother song) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:18, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Pleased to Meet You (Wolfmother song)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Very little info, which could easily be integrated into the main Wolfmother article. The song is not very notable, only appeared on a soundtrack, which like I said should be included in main. Main author of current form of article listing. Andre666 (talk) 07:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Comment There was another AfD discussion that closed 10 days ago with a result of no consensus. What is the purpose of renominating it again so soon afterwards? Blackmetalbaz (talk) 10:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I did notice this, but figured that my alternative may not have been mentioned previously; that is, just to merge the information into the band or album article. Sorry if this is breaking rules. Andre666 (talk) 17:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NSONGS (rank of 83 out of 100 in one poll too low to be significant, coverage almost inexistant).--Boffob (talk) 15:12, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Really weak keep - Is a track on the soundtrack of a major movie (I think that satisfies marginal notability), though the article is pretty darn stubby and shows little potential for expansion at this time. Maybe merge it into the notes section of the main album article and redirect to such or do same towards the band's article. Grandmartin11 (talk) 16:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: stubby but can be expanded. This is a reasonably noted song in a major film release. JamesBurns (talk) 02:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per WP:MUSIC "Notability aside, a separate article is only appropriate on a song when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album.". I don't see this growing beyond a stub - so merge and redirect if useful content to merge or delete if no merge worthwhile. Unusual? Quite  TalkQu  00:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Please see Merge and delete. To be short: You can't delete if material is merged. - Mgm|(talk) 10:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, thanks - what I meant was merge and redirect OR if there is no content worth merging, delete. I'll update accordingly. Unusual? Quite  TalkQu  12:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Simply being featured on an album, soundtrack or otherwise, is not a criteria for notability, WP:MUSIC clearly states that "All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." and "a separate article is only appropriate on a song when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album". It cannot inherit notability from the movie. --neon white talk 03:25, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to the album article per WP:MUSIC. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 03:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 03:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * What is there to merge? --neon white talk 01:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The song originally had another name and it ranked on a notable music poll. Not much else, and admittedly that's borderline trivial. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 05:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as a non-plausible search term, per the reasons given by Unusual? Quite & Neon White.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 00:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.