Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pleasure Mob


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Pleasure Mob

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Created by a user whose name matches one member of the band, no reliable independent sources, minimal claim to notability which is not properly substantiated. If this was a new article I would CSD it as A7/G11 but it's been here for over nine years(!). Guy (help!) 11:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  16:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  16:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Yet another case of a "non-notable band manages to stay on Wikipedia for way too long" disease. This article has been sitting here since 2011 (!) and no one bothered to add reliable sources. Oh well, they don't exist anyway. And when the name of the article creator matches the name of the subject, you know it's a bad sign. Sorry if I sound harsh. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.