Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pleasuredome Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. X clamation point  16:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Pleasuredome Series

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable amateur film trilogy. Ros0709 (talk) 19:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I originally tagged this for speedy deletion per this guideline: Notability. Articles that seem to have obviously non-notable subjects are only eligible for speedy deletion if the article does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. JNW (talk) 19:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete utterly non-notable. JuJube (talk) 02:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable amateur films. SkierRMH  ( talk ) 04:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable film series, lacking in significant coverage from reliable 3rd party sources. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:25, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:12, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * very weak delete as a search shows 3rd party sources do exist... sort of..., but they do not address the trilogy.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.