Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pleasures (brand)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Pleasures (brand)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I do not think any of the sources here are sufficient for notability of this brand, nor can I find anything better.  DGG ( talk ) 23:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC) I cleaned up the page a bit and added some additional references that I could find. 1q9x (talk) 23:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per DGG. The sources, as they currently exist, are to retail outlets (e.g. Urban Outfitters), hybrid retail-editorial outlets (e.g. HYPEBEAST), or contain only routine coverage. My personal BEFORE fails to find anything that would help this get over the GNG threshold. Chetsford (talk) 00:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. SemiHypercube ✎ 00:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - no notable Ghits, fails WP:GNG. Kirbanzo (talk) 03:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.