Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plebvision

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 23:02, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

Plebvision
26 Google hits NN neologism Lotsofissues 02:21, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable neologism. Quale 03:13, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, neologism. Megan1967 10:35, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per Quale, Lotsofissues, and Megan1967. If for some odd reason this is kept, it should be transwiki'd to Wiktionary, and given a thorough scrubbing to remove the heavy POV. But first choice is to get rid of it, until and unless the word actually achieves some common currency. --Jacobw 14:57, 2 May  2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, 127 different Google hits in Usenet 21:09,Qualia 2 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.