Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pledis Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep--Ymblanter (talk) 07:26, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Pledis Entertainment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article that relies on primary sources. Has been tagged as promotional for nine months and as poorly sourced for four months, so does not appear to be likely to be improved in the near future. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. I have added more primary sources and reliable, secondary sources. Please tell me if there are other things that needs to be improved. User:SmileBlueJay97 (talk) 06:10, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T  C  N7 JM  09:52, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Weak Keep. Tough to find many independent references in English, but they are the production company for several clearly notable Korean entertainers charting in Korea and Japan as linked in the article. WP:MUSICBIO suggests that releasing two albums with a major label should convey notability on an entertainer, but makes no mention that this notability flows in reverse (that notable entertainers make their label notable). However, there are enough google hits in english to show this record label exists (some in the article already) and our friends at Korean Wikipedia deem the topic [notable] so I say keep. CooperDB (talk) 10:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 03:38, 23 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per the sources recently added to the article, and indicated above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources, number of notable artists on roster. Appears to be significant player in Korea market.    78.26   (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 14:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.