Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plentyoftorrents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Considering the article and the website, no assertion of notability has been made. -- ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 17:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Plentyoftorrents

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:Notable, WP:WEB. SkyWalker (talk) 04:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not enough independent reliable sources.-Wafulz (talk) 06:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Do Not Delete. Great website and very clear description. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John109096 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * You should check out our guidelines for articles on web content and independent verifiability.-Wafulz (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

What exactly are you asking me to verify? that the website exists? —Preceding unsigned comment added by John109096 (talk • contribs) 16:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Have you read WP:Notable, WP:WEB?. The article you have created fails all the requirements. It fails in notability. In other terms the website is not notable enough for the article to exist. One more last thing it is pure advertising. Iam sure the owner of the website would be you. Am i right john?. --SkyWalker (talk) 04:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - trivial coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 08:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.