Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ples Gilmore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Ples Gilmore

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Coverage is routine sports reporting so the GNG is not met. Doesn't have any accomplishments that meet WP:NBOX. A 4-3 professional record isn't close to showing notability. Sandals1 (talk) 22:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete My search didn't turn up what I would call significant independent coverage on him. I found local coverage and routine sports reporting, but I don't believe WP:GNG is met.  He definitely doesn't meet any of the notability criteria for boxers as either an amateur or professional. Papaursa (talk) 22:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes  23:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I found no sources establishing notability and I doubt that will change down the road. Lovelylinda1980 (talk) 10:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable as a boxer, and the other information in the article is sourced only to primary sources (many of which are not publicly available). power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 19:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.