Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plinth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was '''Consensus to keep and improve. You kept it folks, now please improve it so it meets WP:NOT.'''. undefinedUntil 17:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Plinth

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No more than a dicdef, can be no more than a dicdef, and even includes link to Wiktionary (which has more information than this "article". Emeraude (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless the architectural stuff can be expanded similar to column. – ukexpat (talk) 22:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Of course it can be expanded--there is an immense architectural and sculptural literature available. DGG (talk) 07:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * keep - unfortunately stublike, shouldn't be. Retain stub per DGG. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 21:23, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's a dicdef at present, but there is vast potential for expansion. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.