Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plogger (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:12, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Plogger
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Still not notable Clnreee (talk) 07:05, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 09:38, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 09:38, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 09:38, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 09:38, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EggRoll97 (talk) 22:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Quite promotional in tone and style, with nary a third-party source helping establish notability to be seen.TH1980 (talk) 04:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Clearly not notable, no reliable source reports from google search. I'm pretty sure if we were to include all libraries, Wikipedia would explode. Viztor (talk) 12:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.