Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plou, Aragon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  13:08, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Plou, Aragon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article does not, in my opinion, meet WP:GNG Owen250708 (talk) 12:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Owen250708 (talk) 12:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:43, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * This has an entry. I suspect that they do not hunt partridges and hares there any more, though.
 * Uncle G (talk) 13:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:GEOLAND as a municipality. Here's an article in the Heraldo de Aragón about it, as an example of a source. ev iolite   (talk)  16:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Why was this nominated?  I added two newspaper profiles easily.  It is a legally recognized municipality.--Milowent • hasspoken  19:47, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * keep Things are a little hard to search because "Plou" just means "town", but it's clear that it is a distinct municipality, and GMaps aerials show an obvious town at the spot. Mangoe (talk) 20:46, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is worrying, I mean, there are hundreds of small towns in Spain alone for which you can only find sources in local newspapers and certainly nothing written in English. Is this the start of a campaign to delete many other similar pages? --Jotamar (talk) 23:28, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * A quick look at the nominator's contributions easily yields the answer "no". Besides, the municipalities are legal divisions and will all pass WP:GEOLAND, and it appears that other villages will do the same. Mangoe (talk) 02:12, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * A quick look at the nominator's contributions easily yields the answer "no". Besides, the municipalities are legal divisions and will all pass WP:GEOLAND, and it appears that other villages will do the same. Mangoe (talk) 02:12, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep It complies with WP:GEOLAND.--Asqueladd (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong keep municipalities always pass GEOLAND.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 12:15, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per NGEO. Djflem (talk) 08:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Clearly a recognised settlement. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.