Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plukka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Joanne_Ooi.  MBisanz  talk 00:11, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Plukka

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is fundamentally an advertisement for a retail website Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 03:25, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 16.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  04:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  05:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  05:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: While we can't delete something just because it's an advertisement, I do notice that some of the sources on the article are of dubious reliability. I also noticed that almost all of them are about the company's launch back in 2011. The Tech Crunch article is the most recent, being posted back in March and even then it's pretty much about the launch of the company more than anything else. There's quite a bit of coverage about the company's launch, but then to really show a depth of coverage we'll probably need something other than articles that report the company starting up.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * In any case, I've drastically revamped the article to remove the blatant promotional prose. It's still not perfect, but far improved over the previous version. As far as coverage goes, I'm noticing that apart from the coverage it got when it launched, the website has received no other coverage.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Joanne_Ooi. Other than a spate of coverage about the company launching its website, there really isn't a depth of coverage here. Most of the articles were released around November/December, with only one site giving the website any notice beyond that point and even then it's just focusing on the launch of the company. It's just too soon to have an article for the company. Since one of the people who launched the website has a page here on Wikipedia, it'd be more appropriate to redirect it to her entry and add a brief paragraph on the company. After I removed all of the overly promotional prose, there's only about 1-2 paragraphs of actual data about the company.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:06, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I did a cleanup of Ooi's article in general and added information about her website. Now there is really no reason for there to be a separate article about the website. If it does gain more coverage later on, it can be re-added or un-redirected.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  15:59, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Gongshow  Talk 17:40, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.