Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plum Brandy Blues


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Nightlosers. Anything of substance can be merged from the history, consensus permitting.  Sandstein  18:36, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Plum Brandy Blues

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't seem to be an article at all just seems to be a page with tracklisting no other information. There's not even a page for the artist.JamesAlan1986 *talk 06:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Note - The AFD was malformed as the nominator placed a PROD tag on the article rather than the AFD notice. I have corrected this by placing an AFD notice on the article page. --


 * Merge to Nightlosers. The band article was deleted via PROD, but I've had the deleting admin restore it as I found coverage in Romanian about the band, and some mentions in the NY Times indicating to me that they are notable, andf at the very least should go through AFD if there is any contention about notability.  As for the albums, there may be reviews in Romanian, but relying on machine translation, I was unable to find significant coverage so merging to the discography section of the band article makes the most sense. -- Whpq (talk) 14:49, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG.Stuartyeates (talk) 02:59, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Is there a reason that you oppose merging? -- Whpq (talk) 11:55, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete same as Sittin on the Top of the World above-- ♫GoP♫ T C N 09:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - The issue of non-free content is one of editting, and only requires the removal of the image, and nothing else. And I see no policy that prevents us from including discography information in band articles.  In fact, discography sections are very very (and some more very here) common in band articles. -- Whpq (talk) 13:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.