Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plunderphonics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 23:25, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Plunderphonics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find any significant coverage in reliable, independent sources that would indicate this is a notable term/concept. Normally I'd have prodded this, but it's been hanging around since 2003 so it warrants discussion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 04:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added various references to the article, including one to a book carrying the term in its title. I do think the article needs significant work, however, as its later sections cast the net rather wide: references are needed to place the examples within scope of the article title. AllyD (talk) 08:50, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:38, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:38, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per AllyD. The article needs work but the term is in wide use, is notable and passes WP:GNG.  freshacconci  talk talk  22:11, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:GNG. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:37, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - It passes the notability guidelines and the sources are aplenty, but my, oh my, it needs work. Parts of it are just unsourced promotion. I'll try to aid with the editing and sourcing. Ezhuks (talk) 20:33, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.