Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plunit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 23:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Plunit

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unremarkable, unsourced WP:OR. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. PROD tag removed by author. Recommend Delete. //  Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 21:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * What do you think a Scoville unit is, genius? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaunpeoples (talk • contribs) 21:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * EVERYTHING is made up one day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.221.166.2 (talk) 21:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yup, Rome was made in one day. I'm sick of clever Dans. JuJube (talk) 22:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Devised three days ago.  Unless the original author can come up with reliable sources, then this fails notability standards.   Little Red Riding Hood  talk  22:01, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. To the geniuses who came up with this: you can't talk about the perception of time without at least nodding to Henri Bergson. Also, scientific units should be written up in carefully edited prose. Moreover, author has deleted a WP:OR. Drmies (talk) 22:15, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * DELETE Complete fabrication by (seemingly) two non-notable individuals with apparently too much time on their hands, imho. JasonDUIUC (talk) 22:18, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - creating a measure for something that is non-measurable doesn't make a whole lot of sense. But that may be a matter of perception too. Whatever the case may be, this neologism is not notable. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 22:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - made up one day -- Whpq (talk) 14:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.