Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pluribus International Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Pluribus International Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

American security services company. The article consists almost only of information about its arrested employee Reality Winner. This does not establish notability, per WP:GNG, of the company as such.  Sandstein  09:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete or Redirect to Reality Winner. Fails WP:NCORP, although if enough deep sources turn up then it can be kept. Widefox ; talk 15:05, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- only known for its connection to Winner. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment my hope was that I could find coverage of them- they exist, are in an interesting area (government contracts)- but I haven't found much. I'm surprised by that. I'll continue to poke around for sources on them. Anyhow, as long as this isn't an early-close, it'll be justified as a delete. tedder (talk) 19:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete "substantiating links between Russia and recently inaugurated President Donald Trump" statement not factual and is misleading. Leaked document never mentions Trump or administration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2C1:8702:8130:21F5:CD53:709E:A698 (talk) 04:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello IP user. I edited the part of the article you mentioned. According to WP:RS, some of the information she disclosed pertains to investigations about whether Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election. I tried to reflect what the media actually reported, rather than suggesting that the Russians influenced the election so that Trump won. I agree that that is not what was reported. I added some information to the article too. I don't know whether we should keep or delete this article. I do agree with what tedder suggested, that we poke around a little bit more, and give the proper time given that this isn't an early close.--FeralOink (talk) 03:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep: I changed my mind from a few minutes ago. Pluribus International is owned by the son of a well-known spy novelist, reporter and CIA employee, Charles McCarry. It seems like there are adequate reasons to suggest the company is notable.--FeralOink (talk) 04:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * What are the sources that suggest notability? If the son is notable, should we not hve an article about him instead?  Sandstein   07:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The father already has a BLP article, see Charles McCarry. I made edits to this article which might be useful in deciding whether to keep it.--FeralOink (talk) 08:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Which are the sources that cover the company, specifically, rather than its owner or the leaking case?  Sandstein   20:50, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment. Google news search shows that the Corporation became notable because of the case of Reality Winner. However, the sources provide little info about the company. My very best wishes (talk) 18:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * became "notable" - as in passes GNG and WP:NCORP? (per Sandstein WP:NOTINHERITED) Widefox ; talk 22:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Delete or redirect (and to where)?

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  18:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment -- I don't see any redirect votes. It's still a "Delete" for me. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.