Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plus (Martin Garrix EP)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn for now as there could be more sources after a week. (non-admin closure) Flooded  with them hundreds  11:52, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Plus (Martin Garrix EP)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable unreleased EP, fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM due to the lack of significant coverage and sources are mostly blogs and press releases. Flooded  with them hundreds 07:17, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. None of them are press releases, and if they were blogs and not reliable, then why did you cite one of them (thegroovecartel.com) on Martin Garrix discography when you added the information to that page? Seemed to be just fine when you used it but now it's not? Edm.com and youredm.com are industry websites, and djmag.de is the German website for the publication DJ Mag, hardly a "blog". So it does meet the first criterion of WP:NMUSIC for coverage (they're not trivial mentions, and are independent of the material). It's not surprising that I had your redirect deleted to create an article, and now you're nominating it for deletion. Seems quite vindictive to me; I noticed Seven (EP) uses the same websites and you've edited that quite a few times but that passed your standards...Hmm, that's odd. Coverage will only grow, particularly when it's released in full on 19 October. If it doesn't happen, then I'll redirect it myself. At the least this will not be deleted, but redirected, but good luck with your crusade.  Ss  112   07:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Your EDM, DJ Mag, Dancing Astronaut are reliable but in this case they do not significantly discuss the EP so the GNG isn't satisfied. The creation of this stub is clearly an attempt of retaliation and is only done to prevent me from creating it. Flooded  with them hundreds 07:57, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Retaliation for what, exactly? Another scenario you'll accuse me of but have no evidence for? I'm allowed to have a redirect you created deleted and create an article over it. You don't have claim over something just because you like the subject matter or made a redirect for it. Nobody does. Edm.com must be reliable too; you appear to have used it on your recently created Visceral (album) article as well? You used thegroovecartel to add the information to Martin Garrix discography, so I assume you think it's reliable too unless, of course, for the purposes of this argument your opinion has changed in less than 24 hours?  Ss  112   08:03, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:45, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.